Monday, March 4, 2013

1801

1801
{1215/1216 A.H. - MAY 14}

MUSLIM HISTORY

1801 marked the beginning of armed hostilities between the fledgling United States of America and an existing Muslim state.

In 1801, the Bey of Tripoli, Yusuf Qaramanli, insisted on an increase of payment of safe conduct money by the United States.  Specifically, the Bey of Tripoli demanded that the American ships pay more tribute (a lump sum quarter of a million dollar up front payment and an annual tribute of $20,000) to the pirates of the Barbary States (Morocco, Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli). 

On May 14, 1801, Pasha Yusuf Qaramanli enraged at not receiving the extra tribute, declared war on the United States by the traditional method of sending a group of soldiers to the American consulate in Tripoli and having them chop down the flagpole.

In response, the United States dispatched a squadron of ships under the command of Commodore Richard Dale to the Mediterranean. The American squadron (consisting of the USS President, Philadelphia, Essex, and Enterprise) then proceeded to establish a blockade of Tripoli on July 17.   

On August 1, near Malta, after a sharply fought engagement that lasted three hours and cost the Tripolitan forces 20 killed and 30 wounded, the American schooner Enterprise captured the 14 gun Barbary corsair Tripoli. Lieutenant Andrew Sterett, commander of the Enterprise, ordered the guns of the captured ship to be heaved over the side and its masts cut down. 

This American victory established a long tradition for battleships named Enterprise – a tradition which would make a lasting impact on American history and American imagination {note the highly successful Star Trek media phenomenon}.  Additionally, this initial foreign engagement would provide one of the lines for a poem which would become, in 1847, the Marine Corps anthem, -- The Marines’ Hymn:

From the Halls of Montezuma,
To the shores of Tripoli,
We fight our country’s battles
On the land as on the sea.



*****

The Ottoman Empire

*A treaty was finalized between France and the Ottoman Empire under which Egypt was restored to Turkey (October 9).


*****


Asia

Western Asia

*In Iraq, the Wahhabis conquered and destroyed the Shi‘a pilgrimage sites of Najaf and Karbala.

The British displaced the French in Egypt in 1801, ending France’s threat to Britain’s interests in India.  This eliminated Britain’s need for an alliance to counter French power in the region, further marginalizing Arabia in the minds of the European powers.  However, this neglect left the Saudi-Wahhabi forces unopposed externally in their efforts to establish regional dominance.  With peace prevailing along the border between the Hijaz and Najd, in 1801-1802, Saud, the son of ‘Abd al-Aziz, set out for an attack that would have large repercussions and, for a time, turn the tide against the Wahhabis.  The objective was the Ottoman controlled town of Karbala, in what is now southern Iraq. The Wahhabi were determined to take their battle for the faith’s purity to the scene of the genesis of its split.  The exact date of the attack has been disputed, but many scholars believe it occurred in 1801. 

It must be remembered that Hussein, the son of ‘Ali and the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad, was killed during an internecine Muslim war, after trying to take Kufah in the plain of Karbala. Hussein was subsequently buried in Karbala.  After erecting a shrine on the site itself, the followers of ‘Ali – the Shi‘a – built a town named after Imam Hussein.  The town of Imam Hussein was devastated by the Caliph Mutawakkil in the year 851.  It was then rebuilt by the rulers of Persia after they had introduced the religion of the Shi‘a among their subject states.  Thereafter Shah Isma‘il, the founder of the Safavid dynasty, ordered a mosque to be built over the tomb of Imam Hussein, which was later embellished by his successors Shah Abbas and Nadir Shah.  Adorned with gifts from Persia, this tomb became a place of worship and reverence for the Shi‘a.

The town of Imam Hussein lies east of Hilla. In the early 1800s, it was a small town of about seven to eight thousand inhabitants.  It was governed by a mutasallem who was sent every year by the pasha of Baghdad.  Soldiers in the latter’s pay and a corps of Persians made up the garrison which guarded the treasures of the mosque. These guards, who were almost all Rafdis, as well as the people of Imam Hussein, held ‘Ali in great veneration.  Every year they celebrated the feast of ‘Ali, and made a pilgrimage to his shrine.  ‘Abd al-Aziz, the Wahhabi leader, waited until this feast to storm the town.

On April 20, 1801, the day of the pilgrimage to the shrine, when the town was nearly deserted, ‘Abd al-Aziz executed his plan.  Twelve thousand Wahhabis mounted on six thousand dromedary camels suddenly appeared and overcame the token resistance they encountered, although what resistance there was aroused their wrath sufficiently for them to apply to the letter the intolerant precepts of their creed.  All the men who were found in the town were slaughtered indiscriminately. Pregnant women were themselves disemboweled, and their entrails were slaughtered so that not a single male would survive.

The toll of the victims was counted at three thousand.  The plunder was immense.  The imam’s shrine was covered with a carpet inlaid with pearls.  Some were of an outstanding size.  This treasure, as well as all those which had been brought from Persia, was plundered by the Wahhabis before they destroyed the mosque itself, pulling down its minarets and stripping the dome, whose gold-painted copper they had mistaken for gold leaf.  Two hundred camels carried the spoils back to Diriyah.  ‘Abd al-Aziz completed this immensely profitable excursion without losing a single man.

The news of the sack of Imam Hussein caused consternation in Baghdad and soon spread to the court of the king of Persia.  Fath ‘Ali Shah bitterly reproached Suleiman Pasha for the feebleness of his actions in the Diriyah expedition and threatened to send an army against the Wahhabis if he did not immediately act to destroy them.  Suleiman Pasha made fine promises.  Large numbers of troops were raised in his pashalik, and for a long time they threatened ‘Abd al-Aziz with a new expedition.  Further injunctions from the Ottoman Porte increased the scale of the preparations, but these proved to be without effect.  The only measures taken demonstrated Suleiman’s own lack of faith in the efficacy of such threats.  Great riches still lay in the mosque of ‘Ali.  These were removed and laid upon the tomb of Mashad Imam Musa in order to protect them from a fresh Wahhabi attack.  

*****

*The Englishman Sir John Malcolm of the British East India Company concluded a treaty that called for an Iranian-British military alliance, and the right of unlimited trade in Iran without paying taxes.

*French troops evacuated Egypt (September 2).


*****

*Russia annexed Georgia (September 12).

Czar Alexander I of Russia announced the annexation of the kingdom of Georgia and George XIII, Regent of Georgia, recognized the Russian decision instead of accepting the traditional suzerainty of Persia. Russia’s interest in the land beyond the Caucasus was long-standing and had diverse motivations, but the overriding attraction was the strategic value of the isthmus between the Caspian and Black Seas.  Russian military involvement dated back to the reign of Peter the Great (1682-1725), whose unsuccessful Iranian Expedition aimed at projecting the Russian presence in the direction of the Indian Ocean. The southwest drive resumed in a more sustained and systematic manner under Catherine II (r.1762-1796), and Russia began to throw its weight into the politics of the Transcaucasian states, notably through extending its protection to the Christian rulers of Kakheti-Kartli and Imeretia.  With time, hegemony turned into direct rule when Czar Aleander I (r.1801-1825) proclaimed the creation of the guberniia (province of Georgia, consisting of the lands of the former Kakheti-Kartli kings.

To secure a strategic hold on Georgia, the Russian high command of the Caucasus extended its control over the Azerbaijani khanates eastward to the Caspian coast and southward to the Araxes River by imposing vassalage treaties.  The Russian conquests met with a challenge from Iran, now recovered from its weakness under the new dynasty of the Turkmen Qajar tribe.  There followed two Russo-Iranian wars, both of which Russia won.  The first of the wars ended in the 1813 Treaty of Gulistan awarding Russia most of the Azerbaijan north of the Araxes River.  The second war (1826-1828) ended with the Treaty of Turkmanchai, completing the conquest and establishing the Araxes River as the boundary that permanently divides Azerbaijan in two.


*****

Africa

North Africa, Egypt and Sudan

*British and Ottoman troops under William Keith made an amphibious landing at Aboukir in French occupied Egypt (March 8).

*The French were defeated by the British and Turks at Alexandria (March 21).  The British troops were led by General Ralph Abercromby.

*Yusuf Qaramanli declared war on the United States (May 14).


*****

*The Tripolitan War began between the United States and the Barbary state of Tripoli (modern day Libya) after Tripoli insulted the United States flag (May).  The larger cause of the war was American unwillingness to pay tribute to Tripoli’s Barbary pirates.

As the Hafsid rulers of North Africa attempted to recover from the political, economic, and social crises that had shaken their domains in the fourteenth century, they found themselves hemmed in by European military and commercial domination of the central Mediterranean basin.  To counter widespread attacks on Muslim shipping, the Hafsids encouraged North African seamen not only to engage enemy warships but also to conduct raids of their own against European merchant vessels.  The Europeans’ inability to check the undeclared war that ensued during the 1400s added to the Hafsids’ prestige among their fellow Muslims.  It also added to their income, for although the corsairs … the Barbary pirates … operated independently of the state, the treasury took a share of the profits from the sale of captured ships and cargoes and from the ransoms paid to secure the release of prisoners. 

Early in the sixteenth century Spain, flushed with its victories over the last Muslim states in Iberia, attempted to carry the Reconquista into Africa and eliminate the Barbary corsairs in the process.  These campaigns met with only partial success.  The Spaniards did make some gains in the Maghrib, imposing a virtual protectorate over the emaciated Hafsids from 1535 until 1574.  However, they drove several corsairs, including Khair al-Din Barbarossa and Darghut, to seek help from the Ottoman Empire.

After the Ottoman conquest of North Africa, its new rulers identified themselves even more closely with the corsairs than had the Hafsids.  The pashas, and the deys and beys who followed them, could hardly have done otherwise.  They could not depend on a steady flow of taxes from the interior and were ill-equipped, as a result of the centuries of European commercial domination, to foster peaceful maritime trade.  Sailors from Ottoman lands in the eastern Mediterranean, immigrants from Andalusia, and Christian renegades figured prominently among the leaders of the corsair enterprise during its golden age in North Africa in this era, the Barbary “pirates” epitomized greed, cruelty, and terror.  However, from a North African point of view, the corsair raids were not piracy but, as they had been from their inception, legitimate belligerent acts that provided the only mechanism for Muslims to acquire a share of the lucrative Mediterranean commerce from which the more powerful European navies and merchants had excluded them.

Political, economic, and social upheavals throughout the continent prevented the European states from forcefully addressing the corsair threat until the latter half of the seventeenth century.  In 1662, England and Holland mounted a joint naval expedition that imposed on the bey a treaty protecting their merchant vessels, while France negotiated commercial treaties with the North African rulers in 1665, 1672, and 1685.  The concurrent deterioration of the Muradid dynasty diminished its capacity to resist such European overtures.

The agreements did not end corsair activity, but they did pave the way for its gradual subordination to more customary forms of commerce.  The volume of trans-Mediterranean trade increased in the 1700s but in the continuing absence of a North African merchant fleet most goods still moved in European ships.  Raids persisted, albeit on a considerably reduced scale.  Vessels from the smaller European states and after its independence the United States provided the easiest and most frequently attacked targets.

A general resurgence of corsair attacks occurred while Europe was preoccupied with the Napoleonic Wars.  At the end fo those hostilities, the powers took steps to eliminate the corsairs once and for all.  A British fleet bombarded Tunis in 1816 and after a second show of force three years later the bey acceded to the demands of the Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle and renounced maritime raiding.  Nonetheless, North African corsairs – Barbary pirates – engaged in a brief spurt of activity during the Greek Revolution of the 1820s.  It was not until the establishment of a European presence in the Maghrib, with the French occupation of Algeria in 1830, that the Barbary corsairs totally vanished from the Mediterranean scene.

*****

*Cairo was surrendered by the French to the British (June 18 [27?]).  French forces in Cairo, under command of Belliard surrendered, forcing the capitulation of Menou in Alexandria in August. 

Successor in July 1800 to General Kleber as governor of Egypt on behalf of Napoleon Bonaparte, Menou was a Muslim convert who declared Egypt to be a French colony.  His conversion did not endear him to the French, nor his declaration of Egypt’s colonial status to the Egyptians.  As an administrator and general he was unable to restore order fully or to meet the British and Ottoman challenge.  This began in March 1801 and resulted in the British and Ottoman capture of Rosetta, followed by an advance on the Delta.  Meantime, an Ottoman force advanced against the French overland from Syria.  To meet this two-pronged attack the defense of Cairo was left in the hands of General Belliard, while Menou himself advanced with his troops to Alexandria and the coast.  Belliard, faced with the spread of plague of Cairo, local resistance and the prospect of heavy fighting, surrendered.  Menou was then left isolated in Alexandria.  His own surrender followed, and by October 1801 the French had withdrawn from Egypt.


*****
 
*The American schooner Enterprise captured the fourteen gun Barbary corsair Tripoli (August 1).

After a sharply fought engagement that lasted three hours and cost the enemy 20 killed and 30 wounded, the American schooner Enterprise captured the Barbary corsair Tripoli.  Because Lieutenant Andrew Sterett’s instructions did not allow him to take prizes, the American commander ordered the guns of the captured ship to be heaved over the side and its mast cut down. In this state, the Tripoli was allowed to return home, where a grim fate doubtless awaits the unfortunate captain at the hands of the Yusuf Qaramanli, a ruler noted for his fondness for inflicting punishment.  For his part, Sterett, who lost not a man in the fight, continued on his way to Malta to take on water for the rest of the fleet. 

On May 14, Yusuf Qaramanli declared war on the United States by the traditional method of sending a group of soldiers to the American consulate in Tripoli and having them chop down the flagpole.  However, this action coincided with the final readying of Commodore Richard Dale’s squadron, which then set sail for the Mediterranean June 2 and blockaded Tripoli beginning on July 17. 

*****

*French troops departed from Egypt under the pressure of an Ottoman expedition corps led by Muhammad ‘Ali and under the pressure of the British (August 31).

Muhammad ‘Ali Pasha (Mehmed ‘Ali Pasha) (b. c. 1768-1849) was the Ottoman governor general and effective ruler of Egypt (r.1801-1848).  He assumed the title khedive (in Persian, khadiv – “lord”), granted officially in 1867 by the Ottoman Sultan Abdulaziz to his grandson Isma‘il Pasha.  Muhammad ‘Ali Pasha’s career can be divided into four distinct periods: (1) his rise to the position of governor general and the consolidation of his power [1801-1811]; (2) the period in which he laid the economic and military foundations for what later became a regional empire centered on Egypt [1812-1827]; (3) the height of Egyptian hegemony and the beginning of the disintegration of Muhammad ‘Ali Pasha’s economic control system [1828-1841]; and (4) the post-heroic phase and the setting in of realism and retrenchment [1841-1848]. 

*****

*The French surrendered Alexandria and were compelled to evacuate (September 2 [3?]).  French forces in Egypt under General Jean Menou surrendered to the British and were immediately offered free passage home, ending Napoleon Bonaparte’s hopes of oriental conquest.

Napoleon Bonaparte landed in Alexandria in July 1798 at the head of a French Expeditionary Force, accompanied by a group of scientists and scholars who were to conduct a major study of the country.  He justified his invasion as an attempt to support the Ottomans in Egypt (without, however, informing the Ottoman Sultan) against the anarchy inflicted by the Mamelukes, two of whom, Murad and Ibrahim Bey, were in power in Cairo.  Napoleon, who obviously envisaged French control of the country as permanent, established a series of Diwans (consultative councils on the Ottoman mode) in the cities held by the French.  Egypt was divided into sixteen military districts with French military governors working through local officials.

The British responded to the French advance by sending a fleet under Nelson to Abu Qir in August 1798, which sank the French fleet.  The Ottomans declared war the next month.  Napoleon’s attempt to extend his conquest to Syria in 1799 was halted at Acre by the Ottoman commander Jazzar Pasha, with British assistance.  Napoleon also had to confront the active hostility of the Mamelukes, in bitter exile in Upper Egypt, and a revolt by Muslims in Cairo, which was brutally suppressed.  The French meanwhile were facing administrative and financial difficulties with their occupation.

Napoleon left Egypt just over a year after his arrival, turning power over to General Kleber.  Faced with an impossible military situation, Kleber attempted to negotiate a convention with the British in January 1800, but the rejection of this convention by the British, communicated to him by Admiral Keith, led Kleber reluctantly to reopen hostilities.  He was assassinated in June 1800, whereupon General Menou was put in charge. 

Menou advanced north to meet an Ottoman army, which was supported by British reinforcements in March 1801, leaving General Compte Belliard in Cairo.  Beset by a widespread outbreak of plague and local resistance, General Belliard was forced to capitulate, and eventually Menou, defending Alexandria, accepted terms.  The French departed from Egypt by October. 

Despite the brevity and unpopularity of the French occupation of Egypt (and their nearly continuous involvement in military challenges to their rule) the French made a strong impact there.  The organization and equipment of the French troops and their training, artillery, and general level of performance were noted by the more astute Mameluke and Ottoman officers, one of whom, the Albanian Muhammad Ali, took power in Egypt four years later, deeply committed to the modernization of the Egyptian army on European lines.  The cultural impact produced during this short invasion was also considerable.  The scholars accompanying the expedition staffed the Institut de l’Egypte, giving Egyptian scholars for the first time a broad exposure to all aspects of European culture while the French collected information on Egypt.  The Institut also set up the first Arabic language printing press. 

The French invasion in every sense marked the beginning of a period of revolutionary change in Egypt, with the rejoining of Egypt to the world outside its borders and the awakening of European interest in the country.

*****

*Khusrau Pasha became the viceroy of Egypt.  He would hold this position until 1803.

*Murad Bey, one of the Mameluke duumvir ruling Egypt before French invasion, tried to regain power.

*****

*Between 1801 and 1805, a power struggle ensued between the Mamelukes, the Ottoman governor and the Albanian brigade of Muhammad ‘Ali.

The Mameluke dynasty was formed by an aristocracy of white slaves.  The Mameluke slaves had, by definition, limited rights to transfer their positions and their wealth to their children, thus preventing them from creating hereditary dynasties.  However, with the establishment of the Mameluke dynasty of Egypt, this and other rules were relaxed and many Mameluke sultans were the children of former Mameluke sultans. 

The Mamelukes rose to power from having become the strongest and best organized organization in Egypt under the Ayyubid sultan.  The last of these sultans, as-Salih, had, over a decade, bought large quantities of slaves from foreign lands in order to protect his own position.  When he died, the Mamelukes had his heir murdered and transferred power to their own ranks through the Ayyubid sultan’s last wife, Shajar ad-Durr, who then married the Mameluke general Aybak. 

It took the Mamelukes only a decade to formalize power, of which the re-establishment of the caliphate in Cairo was part of the legitimization process.    The dynasties through Mameluke history, Bahri and Burji, took their names from the quarters where the troops that seized power had been stationed.  At its largest, the Mamelukes’ empire included the three most important religious cities of Islam: Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem.  However, the real cultural and, therefore, theological capital of the Mameluke era was Cairo.

Among the main achievements of the Mameluke period was the development of historical writing.  Nevertheless, the times did not allow serious deviations from the standard religious science which ultimately affected Ibn Taimiya and his attempts to cleanse Islam of superstition and foreign accretions.  As Baghdad had been razed by the Mongols only a few years after the beginning of their era, Cairo was also the economic capital of the Muslim world.

The Mamelukes never managed to develop a clear system of who should take over the sultan throne, when the old sultan died.  The fundamental rule of no transferring of power to children, was broken numerous times in the Bahri period.  In general, it was power that decided who should become the new sultan, allowing much destructive friction between Mameluke groups.  However, the principle remained that the sultan always came from the same group, first Bahri, then Burji.  Some sultans did, however, succeed in taming frictions and were able to establish stable state structures.  This stability was always in jeopardy when the sultan died.

The golden age of the Mameluke period lasted from 1250 until 1350.  This was a period of relative good living standards, good relations with foreign powers and peaceful relations between peoples inside the state.  The next 170 years or so was a period of setbacks, economical problems, military defeats and loss of territory.

The Mamelukes did not disappear when their dynasty was replaced by Ottoman suzerainty in 1517.  They stayed on as the leading class in the Egyptian society, and in the 17th century they won back actual power in the country, and would keep this for about 200 years.  During this period, they were replenished by purchases made from slave markets.

*****

*Between 1801 and 1805, the United States navy destroyed the navy of the Qaramanli of Tripolitania (Libya) in retaliation for piracy.

In 1801, the Bey of Tripoli insisted on an increase of payment of safe conduct money by the United States.  In response, the United States dispatched a naval squadron to the Mediterranean.  As a consequence, four years of war erupted between the United States and the Qaramanli – the rulers of Tripolitania

The Qaramanli were a family of Turkish origin, several members of whom governed Tripolitania, Libya, from 1711 to 1835, constituting themselves into a real dynasty. They supported the Arabs against the Turks, without however rejecting Ottoman suzerainty.

The Qaramanli dynasty was a Turkish dynasty founded by the original Qaramanli, Ahmed Bey, which controlled Ottoman Tripolitania and, intermittently, Cyrenaica and Fezzan, from 1711 to 1835. Ahmed Bey had been appointed to a subprovincial administrative position and took advantage of disorders within the Ottoman military to usurp power.  Efforts by Sultan Ahmed III to install a new governor were rebuffed, and Ahmed won recognition as pasha by 1722.

From this point to the end of the century, two Qaramanli successors, first Ahmed’s son Mehmed (r. 1745-1754) and then Mehmed’s son Ali (r. 1754-1793), obtained recognition of their control over Tripolitania.  They gained even broader authority from their ability to suppress local uprisings in neighboring Cyrenaica and the Fezzan.  Apparently this ability was based on different sources of military support for the Qaramanlis, including remaining imperial Janissary units as well as mercenary forces of diverse nationalities. At the same time, Tripoli became a base for pirates who, by contributing to the pasha’s coffers, enjoyed Qaramanli patronage.  Symbiotic relations with pirates played an important role in Qaramanli history from the end of Ali’s reign to the dynasty’s fall four decades later.

Already under Ahmed Pasha, efforts had been made to secure trade relations with European powers.  France and England, specifically, signed several bilateral agreements with Tripoli.  By superseding Ottoman capitulations the rulers of Tripoli already held, such treaties in effect recognized the independence of the Qaramanlis.  To maintain benefits offered by bilateral treaties, Tripoli often had to press protected pirate factions not to attack maritime traders operating under the flags of signatory nations.  This led to diplomatic clashes with victims of Tripoli based piracy, particularly from neighboring Italian states and, most notably in 1800, the United States.

It was factors such as these that gradually weakened Qaramanli control.  In 1790, the assassination of Ali Pasha’s heir apparent precipitated a succession struggle.  Two sons and a total outsider from Algiers vied for Ali’s post.  Expanding intrigues brought Hamuda Bey of the Ottoman Regency of Tunis into the succession struggle on the side of the Qaramanli family.  Conflicting claims between Ali’s two sons Ahmed and Yusuf, and then among Yusuf’s descendants, continued to plague Qaramanli rule over the next few decades.  At each stage of infighting, one finds external sponsorship for one or another of the candidates for the Tripoli governorship.  From Napoleonic times until his abdication in 1832, Yusuf Pasha clearly preferred French sponsorship.  His error was to offer France a formal treaty in 1830, soon after the French occupied the Algiers Regency.  Alarmed critics of France’s advance into Algeria, led by the British, tried to undermine Yusuf’s pro-French posture by championing an heir who would reverse the Tripoli-Algiers-Paris alignment.  When Yusuf attempted to pass his governorship on to his son Ali in 1832, his grandson Mehmed Bey counted on British support to thwart his grandfather’s preference for Ali.

After Istanbul failed to obtain Britain’s recognition of an imperial firman granting the succession of Ali, Sultan Mahmud II finally decided in 1835 to send an armed force to proclaim the end of Qaramanli ascendancy.  The return to direct imperial rule was in part tied to pressures by Britain to oppose a Qaramanli successor who was openly receptive to French overtures.  It is also likely, however, that the Ottoman sultan was reacting to another, more serious threat from Tripoli’s dominant neighbor to the east; this threat had taken form in 1831 when Muhammad ‘Ali, governor of Egypt, had expanded his control across Sinai in Syria. 


*****

Western Africa

*The Temne and Bulom attacked Freetown (Sierra Leone).  They were driven off by the British, the Loko, and the American, Jamaican and Nova Scotian Maroons (November 18).

*****

Notable Births

*Ali ibn Khalifa, the Qa’id of the Naffat, was born.

Ali ibn Khalifa (1801-1884) was the Qa’id of the Naffat, a tribe from the region between Sfax and Gabes in Tunisia.  With beylical rule collapsing in the summer of 1881, he organized resistance against the invading French forces.  Ali’s hopes of Ottoman support did not materialize, nor was he able to persuade the settled communities of his region to join the struggle.  By the end of the year, French troops had defeated Ali’s warriors and driven them into Tripolitania.  There he and his followers proved an embarrassment to the Ottoman provincial authorities.  Wishing to avoid a conflict with France, they urged Ali and his supporters to accept the pardon offered by the protectorate government and return to Tunisia.  Ali died before agreeingto the offer of amnesty, but by 1885 virtually all of his supporters had done so.

*****

*Amjad Ali Shah, a King of Oudh, is believed to have been born in this year.

Amjad Ali Shah (b. c. 1801 – d. February 13, 1847) was the fourth King of Oudh from May 17, 1842 to February 13, 1847.

Amjad Ali Shah was the son of Muhammad Ali Shah. Muhammad Ali Shah had made every effort to ensure that the heir apparent received an excellent education and, therefore, entrusted Amjad to the company of religious scholars, which instead of making him an intelligent ruler made him a devout Muslim. Thus, he became the most deeply religious, circumspect and abstinent ruler of Oudh.

Amjad Ali Shah began to reign in May 1842.  By this time the British Government had become so powerful in Oudh that it was searching for a way to seize it. Amjad Ali Shah was of a helping nature, very polite and well mannered.

Due to Amjad Ali Shah’s abstainism, the system of administration set up by Muhammad Ali Shah became completely disorganized.

Amjad Ali Shah constructed Iron Bridge over the river Gomti and constructed a metal road from Lucknow to Kanpur which still follows the same route.

Amjad Ali Shah also built Hazratganj, the great European style market.

The great Aminabad Bazar and a Serai at Kanpur road were constructed by his minister Amin-ud-Daula.

Amjad Ali Shah also constructed the Shrines of Syedna Muslim and Hani, at Kufa.

Amjad died due to cancer on February 13, 1847 at the age of 47 years. He was buried at Imambara Sibtainabad in the western part of Hazratganj, Lucknow.  He was succeeded by his son Wajid Ali Shah.


*****

*İbrahim Sarim Pasha (1801–1853), an Ottoman statesman, was born. He was Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire from April 29, 1848 until August 12, 1848.


*****

*Rifa’a Rafi Tahtawi, a member of the liberalizing element within the Egyptian ‘ulama’, was born.

Rifa’a Rafi Tahtawi (1801-1873) was a member of the liberalizing element within the Egyptian ‘ulama’ (Islamic religious and legal scholars). Tahtawi studied with Shaykh Hasan al-Attar at al-Azhar and was influenced by Attar’s description of his experiences with the French expedition to Egypt (1798-1801), when he had visited the French Institute and observed the work of the scholars there. Tahtawi’s career served as an important link between the more traditional elements of religious and scholarly life in Egypt and the Westernizing trends of the country’s leadership.

Tahtawi was appointed Imam (spiritual counselor or guide) to the new Egyptian army and spent five years in France, 1826-1831, as Imam to the Egyptian educational mission sent there by Muhammad Ali.  Upon his return in 1832 he became editor of the Official Gazette, in addition to translating many classics and works of philosophy from French into Arabic.  He was appointed a member of a governmental secretariat on education in 1836.  Tahtawi’s career suffered a brief eclipse during the reign of Abbas I (r.1848-1854), but he was returned to favor by Sa‘id (r.1854-1863) and helped set up the new Egyptian educational system.  He fell out with Sa ‘id toward the end of the latter’s reign but was again restored, this time by Isma‘il (r.1863-1879).  Tahtawi became editor of an educational magazine, resumed his directorship of the Language School at the School of Artillery (a post he had first held in 1833) and became head of the Translation Office.


*****

Notable Deaths

*Murad Bey, a Mameluke ruler of Egypt, died.

With Ibrahim Bey, Murad Bey ruled Egypt from the death of their master, Abu’dh-Dhahab, in 1775.  Ibrahim took the title of ‘Shaykh al-Balad,” which conferred nominal superiority on him within the Duumvir, but Murad’s character more than balanced this.  Murad and Ibrahim’s control of Egypt depended on their ability to keep the other Mameluke factions in line.  Murad wished to assassinate Isma‘il Bey, a Mameluke of ‘Ali Beyand the strongest of their potential challengers.  His plans were discovered, and the other Mameluke factions, including the ‘Alawiyya (of the late ‘Ali Bey) forced the Duumvir to leave Cairo in 1777.  They managed to restore themselves the next year, and drove the ‘Alawiyya and Isma‘il from Cairo.  The ‘Alawiyya retreated to Upper Egypt.

Murad and Ibrahim proved unable to defeat the ‘Alawiyya in a series of campaigns, and in 1781 Murad ceded to them a large area in Upper Egypt.  He then turned against Ibrahim and expelled him from his office and from Cairo in 1784, though the two were reconciled and jointly ruling again the next year.  Murad led the unsuccessful defense of Egypt against the Ottoman army in 1786 and with Ibrahim was in exile during the rule of Isma‘il.  The Duumvir regained power in 1791 following Isma‘il’s death.

Murad was twice defeated by the French during their invasion of Egypt in 1798 and was forced to retreat whilt Ibrahim fled to Syria.  However, he eventually joined forces with the French when it became obvious the Ottomans were determined to re-exert control. He became governor of Upper Egypt in the Spring of 1800 and defeated the Ottoman forces under Dervish Pasha.  Murad died one year later during a widespread outbreak of plague.

*****





No comments:

Post a Comment